What Happens When Someone Dies From A Glio

VERY ANGRY

VERY ANGRY

is best sometimes, you know, the enemy of good. But do we really want the best in not matching the justice reform support measures essential to its effectiveness? We doubt it seriously. We doubt so that we are asking ourselves: Is what we have been deceived and duped by the other two powers, in particular, the Executive?

They made us many promises but they held no so far. The peace court Acul North is always at the heart of a public market and a cemetery. Ah! If the dead could talk! In Port-Margot, the magistrate shall take place at the police station or at home, proudly under a mango tree, for lack of room. We went back to the Stone Age.

In Cap-Haitien, a Magistrate has been the subject of verbal abuse within a public service vehicle, and this, in the exercise of his duties while he was traveling the scene of a crime in search evidence concerning a case which he is responsible. This happened because the law on the status of the judiciary, government officials from the Department of Justice does not recognize the work of magistrates, minimize its value and does not respect his honor and power.

However, when it comes to burlesque festival, small projects demagogic, fiction, political or other social events, we do not skimp on resources. The central government grants and bounty unimaginable benefits to individuals who have no use ... no really for society.

In reality, work a President of the Republic, a parliamentarian, minister, secretary of state, a CEO, a dean, a government commissioner, a commissioner of police , a departmental representative, a director of customs and telecommunications and so on ... is nothing compared to that of a Magistrate. Yet, yet ...

We do not really expect a radical change in our judicial system but rather to the developments to ensure the best possible justice. Unfortunately, the commitments made by the State in respect of justice continue from day to day not to be respected and are still not effectively implemented. More than two months after the publication of the reform laws, the magistrates, mainly investigating judges, despite their mobilization, are facing difficulties in the unacceptable practice.

Today we cry our ras-le-bol of this situation. And we're really angry. It does not reform for the sake of reform. It is done because there is an urgent need to change things. Our leaders and Politicians are all bad guys who do not think this country.

"That wickedness is a culture in Haiti, not the high cost of living."

Heidi FORTUNE
Magistrate, Magistrate
Cap-Haitien, Haiti
This

March 1, 2008 Read more ...

Why People Are Posting Numbers On Facebook

to Facebook! For

After several months of inactivity on this blog, I absolutely wanted to revive it, technological developments are constantly taking over ... we go again with a rant against Facebook ...

NO TO FACEBOOK!

Oh! it is known social networks (sites where the members are related to common interests) . I already talked about the loss of individual freedoms that engendered ... But I forgot to introduce you worse ... much worse: Facebook ... Besides the fact that you disclose your identity ... it is operated by Facebook! An infringement on individual freedoms because with your legal agreement ... but what do the police?

1) Facebook: a social network ... who exploits you!
1.1) A social network Facebook is
like many other similar sites: a social network. You register, share your pictures, moods, ... while more or less revealing your identity to the world. hitherto unexceptional even if it annoys me already ... Indeed, why do you show the world even though you do not know who will consult with your profile ... This will know everything about you, your relationships, ... In short: a "Big Brother" that you created yourself without realizing it! Certainly you can complain about my pessimistic side ... but the facts are there: on Internet the world does not want you well ...
I do not blame the marketers and other perverse personalized advertising, but I throw at you (but gently so as not to hurt you ...).
In fact, you're the first to complain about spam (junk mail), spam that you are also becoming more envoys personalized (Dear Mr. X, as you focus the study of flies and we can offer you a microscope [...]) exceptionnel. But you look good ... more precisely, you suffer in part because of you.
spammers and other advertisers do not use the information you disclose without your knowledge as you ... but when you register on these sites, check out the little lines that you are asked to accept by checking a small box you will see that these data will be made visible and can be used except by the site itself Similarly, by persons external to the site that they view your profile. Ah yes ... do not believe that the task of collecting personal data is daunting: it is done automatically by robots. Robots also more efficient now because some are able to effectively pass information from several different locations. Clearly, the more you sign up on "social networking" or testify on your blogs characters or by leaving comments, the more you learn about yourself. You thought George Orwell was utopian?
1.2) you violated Facebook ... with your consent!
This is serious! Very serious! Facebook, in addition it is a social network, you fly (finally acquired since you allow) all your rights to what you publish. Yes, everything you post may be used freely by unrequited facebook: personal data, photos, texts, videos, ... That still does not make you jump up? But imagine what they can do with these data: for sale thousands of sites for personalized advertising, use your records for promotional campaigns, disclose your personal information anywhere on the web ... In short, this is terrible because you have no recourse to the use they can make of your information. You may say that this rule is there for ease in managing the site. Well you're wrong! It is easy to manage such a site even if the disclaimer is consistent. But it is never necessary that the site acquires all the rights: a simple permission to publish enough.

1.3) The new Patriot Act ... You know the
Patriot Act? It is a statutory provision passed by the U.S. following the attacks of September 11, 2001. This allows them to apply to any company's personal information and that any individual without that you do not know anything! Unacceptable I hope you exclaim! At worst, some say it's for security (inter) national ... Moving on. Well
with Facebook is the new Patriot Act. Except that your data will not the government, but in any society who will pay dearly enough to get them ... and you will not see anything or money or transactions ...

2) Tips and yell
Now you're now aware. So here are some tips:
- Do not sign up on this kind of site
- Well if you really want, not give out any personal
- Be vigilant in informing you post, know that it can be read by anyone!

And my rant:
- Do not complain over getting spam, you'll have tried!
- Do not be surprised to find several results pages by typing your name into a search engine
- Stop believing that the web is great and there is no risk ...

Facebook is dangerous. Stop to believe in an ideal web where "everyone is beautiful, everyone is nice." But hey, I recognize nonetheless that the Internet is paved with good intentions ...

Cube Runner Game Unblocked At School

IMMUNITY IS NOT IMPUNITY

IMMUNITY IS NOT IMPUNITY

If a parliamentary hearing as a witness does not pose any difficulties and does not involve the lifting of parliamentary immunity, the situation is more delicate when it 's acts to continue when he is suspected of having committed an offense.

immunity does not mean impunity. It aims to ensure the proper functioning of the Legislature, not to protect the parliamentarian as an individual. The House should simply check if the request is sincere and serious.

To be honest, it can not be inspired by other motives than a proper administration of justice. To be serious, it can not hurt obviously no legal impediment, especially if there is sufficient evidence on the existence of the alleged facts.

A request for waiver of parliamentary immunity whether formulated by the Government Commissioner or the Magistrate, tends only to allow the exercise of public action. Besides, you know the saying "nobody is above the law."

It is unthinkable that a section of the parliament to oppose the lifting of immunity of one of its members under the pretext, for example, that this will hinder the normal work of the Assembly whose parliamentary belongs.

One can not imagine having been denied a waiver of immunity of a senator or a MP, because it can see the exercise of his mandate impeded by interrogation and even an indictment, or that his arrest may have the effect of upsetting the balance of power that result in the parliament.

was not to balance the need to ensure the normal administration of justice and of ensuring the proper functioning of the parliamentary institution. Any request for waiver of immunity made by the justice should be executed because of this lack of formality, and provided there is no flagrante delicto, any judicial inquiry to identify evidence or even an indication of guilt in charge is zero, and without regard for the public prosecutor or investigating magistrate handling the case.

However, despite this coverage, and this largesse Constitution under Article 114, the legislature is not an untouchable because in case of flagrante delicto, he is deprived of the benefit of immunity. And that is why we insist that Article 115 of the constitution does not enshrine the absolute impunity of parliamentarians. These, during the session and provided there is no evidence for red-handed carrying an afflictive and degrading, are protected against arbitrary arrest or prosecution.

By protecting this way, the grantor had no other purpose than to protect the public against any threat to the way they expressed their vote during elections. That is to say, the immunity is to prevent the executive and judiciary, for arbitrary decisions, alter the balance of power in parliament and thus jeopardize the operation thereof.

Explained in this way, the immunity can be analyzed as an accompanying measure of the system democratic. It is also necessary that parliamentarians, when ruling on a request to lift immunity on one of their peers, do not adopt a protectionist attitude. In other words, the arbitrary nature of proceedings shall be proved for a House refuses to lift the immunity of one of its members.

Heidi FORTUNE
Magistrate, Magistrate
Cap-Haitien, Haiti
This

February 24, 2008 Read more ...