Gay Cruising Spots In Us.

Access to culture: necessarily free?

Access to culture should necessarily be free?

The web laws continues to make stir several years ago. However, this law could not be more controversial raises a very important debate in our societies: access to culture should necessarily be free?
We start first with the positive response to this question: "Yes, access to culture should necessarily be paid." Then we will go the other way: 'No access to culture should certainly not be paying. This will allow us, I hope to reach a junction to provide an answer on this highly philosophical!

1) Yes, access to culture should be paying!
Access to culture is access to the work of one or more persons, one or more organizations. That which enriches our knowledge, that builds our thoughts, which entertained us intelligently, allowing us to feel we live in society and enjoy life in this community, which allows us to move forward, in short, that generates advanced societies.
But if we start to offer free access to this culture, those who are manufacturers or preservatives will be even less well paid. Being paid less, it's risky not to live in this building or cultural preservation. And it therefore has the potential to see fewer and fewer manufacturers or preservatives culture. But in this case, which is enriched you ask? Some take advantage and abuse the money, but it is an economic problem as in all sectors: that is the evil of developed societies. Also, book a paid access to culture is to allow small companies (with large groups also obviously) to continue to live. Culture is not just a producer: a set of individuals who work there. Money is the sinews of war to culture as well.

2) No, the access to culture should be free!
If access to culture is free, so the majority of people can benefit, especially the most disadvantaged. By offering free, it broadens the scope of this culture and it prevents from widening the gap between castes who could access all forms of culture and other less privileged classes who would sacrifice themselves for access. Access to free culture would be a vehicle for gathering, unity if not unity, and thus a guarantor of equality in access to every culture. But there arises a problem: no money, culture has a future? Another question: everyone should it necessarily have access to all forms of culture or culture should not she be protected from access too massive? This leads us to ask ourselves: to offer free access to general culture, it would tend not to degrade?

3) Culture: a common share rich
In sum, it is necessary to preserve our culture, to avoid making a commodity sold off by offering it for free. Culture is a service and even a fine. Culture is not a bottomless pit to drink too freely at its source, it will eventually become polluted due to overexploitation or even dry up. In addition, some of this windfall benefit "all free" to exploit to their advantage this source. Hence the fact that you have to pay to ensure their safety and preservation of its quality. But the problem resurfaced previously raised: why some might be accessed easily and others are expected to bleed to pretend to touch this world so distant from their cultural concerns or desires? Also, a principle of more equal access to culture should be established: the rates proportional to income, for example ...

Culture is an asset of the noblest. We need to protect, preserve, ensure its expansion and further its expansion to all populations. The financial problem is urgent in this case. It would, for the sake of equality, that everyone can access the same services and cultural products. However, cost is a significant obstacle. Conversely, offer free access would degrade the culture and no longer feed its constant innovation. So why not create an egalitarian principle: access to the halls at different rates (Practically impossible to manage) and then develop, as is already the case in many cities, shows and other cultural celebrations in the poorest neighborhoods. The principle is:
If you're not going to culture, the culture will come to you. If you do not have the means to go to the culture, the culture will come to you. By cons if you do not want the culture, hide!