Risk (s) informational (s)?
This problem question on which I attempt to answer was inspired by the subject of the test of CAPES External Documentation 2008. The Web is constantly evolving, increasingly satisfying the demands or requirements of its internet users. But users are many, they have a different vision of the Web and different opinions about its possible control and / or protection.
So what's actions affect everyone on the destiny of the web? The web can reconcile two antagonistic conceptions namely the point of view "security free-flow and point of view" freedom agora?
Free-Flow Security, Freedom Agora, two very different visions "
two competing visions about the current vision of the web: the "all-safe" against the "free flow of ideas," protection of individual liberties against universal access to information. Free-Flow Security
: Consists ensure increased security of the system information. The drifts are systems impervious to information exchanges and even the advent of a closed universe closed in on itself.
Freedom Agora is to ensure a democratic movement of information, total transparency in information exchanges. The drifts are inadvertent capture of information or a hindrance to effective democratic communication.
A simple solution would be for these clans coexist fairly, to avoid the excesses to which they tend to like the work areas defined by the Forum on Internet Governance in Athens (Security, Openness, Diversity, Access). But the situation is more complex than the web is invaded by personal, social, economic and political contexts.
When an axis dominates the other ...
economic interests, sales and marketing tip the balance either side of the axis is an axis of the other side ... In fact, advocating freedom of expression, some companies do not hesitate to invade the web, to monopolize the detriment of others, who, not having the same powers to be heard, are forced to shut or whisper their claims. In addition, these companies maintain that a maximum flow of information: it is much easier for them to collect personal data that you scatter more or less intentionally on the web. In short, the theory of "transparency" or "free speech" put forward by major groups is merely a ploy to collect more and more personal data on you ... more or less "Unbeknownst to us voluntarily" to quote a great philosopher sport ...
Internet would be the largest democracy, where everyone can express themselves freely, voluntarily, without constraint! But that is not counting on access to technology Information and communication technology (ICT) still reserved for developed countries or developing countries (DCs) but not those in developing countries (DCs). Then, filters Government exist in many countries, like China, South Korea ... often with support from big companies like Google or Microsoft Yahoo!! We are still far from the "global village" of Marshall McLuhan or "global brain" of Joel de Rosnay ...
risks for a major risk?
risks listed above are far from exhaustive. We could also add the Acts cybercriminals even terrorists will continue to increase. Also, these risks combined, they do not fear a major information risk? Technology does she not destroy itself thereby generating an impact on all of the great world's information system? The question is more alarming than ever. Concern is growing each day as the web grows. Certainly we must ensure that the web is not derived, but there is not a drift that can be feared, but rather a grounding! Hopefully we will not get to a stranding (voluntary stranding) ! How
will then define the major risks and what are the consequences? The major risk
sound the death knell of techno-informational. And as a major part of information systems were transferred on media technology, imagine the terrible consequences this may have for the stability of a society, a state of the planet! It's all Access to information that they find upset, he will reinvent the traditional access to information (documents back to "physical"), it will change how we access information ("Google ... but there's more how I am do! "). The greatest risk will have substantial impact on the entire world economy ... Ah, the only" benefit "will be finally developed societies that include live everyday Countries Development (if not underdeveloped).
Another perspective alarmist? Yes and claimed "The danger is at our doorstep. This is even more dangerous than many companies this half-open door for their personal interests . Fortunately, the rim lock door chain is securely held by Internet users and believe that few institutions are unfortunately not enough heard. It is everybody's role of helping to ensure that this door opens slightly more, and barricade the danger ... while allowing free passage of information.
How? Find this the carpenter's door tomorrow web: clean, reliable, where the risks are monitored and controlled by each hazard. Again and again the concept of "cybtoyenneté" but that international politics more than ever a role to play ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment